Question of the Day

USDA announces new pork temperature recommendation

Rob Levitt's Profile Photo Rob Levitt
Executive Chef/Owner
The Butcher & Larder
Chicago, IL

It's a great step in the right direction, but those who already understand that good pork should be served pink have been cooking and requesting that way for years. The average, everyday folk still fear trichinosis, so they will continue to hammer their pork into dry, tasteless cardboard regardless of what the USDA says. We still have a long way to go.

Janna Mestan's Profile Photo Janna Mestan
General Manager
Haymarket Pub & Brewery
Chicago, IL

It's about time really! Pork should be a beautiful rosy pink - they don't even teach about Trichinosis anymore in sanitation classes.

Dan Smith's Profile Photo Dan Smith
Executive Chef/Owner
Hearty
Chicago, IL

About time! Maybe the days of dry overcooked pork are coming to an end! Personally I prefer my pig a little pink.

Joncarl Lachman's Profile Photo Joncarl Lachman
Executive Chef/Owner
HB Home Bistro
Chicago, IL

i personally feel that pork should be taken to 125---then rested...but that is for personal consumption. To keep pork juicy and succulent 145 is a better choice than 160...thanks USDA

John Caputo's Profile Photo John Caputo
Executive Chef
The Chicago Firehouse
Chicago, Illinois

It's about time. Not much tastes moist and delicious at 160 degrees

Joseph  Comfort's Profile Photo Joseph Comfort
Executive Chef/Owner
Lebanese Taverna Group, Iron Horse Restaurant
MD, DC, Northern VA and Ashland, VA

Wow, they did it! Commercial pork has been safe for over 25 years. Pastured pork is safer still. Curing and brining further ensure the foodsafety of the product and like all meats 160 is well done and not pleasing to the palate. That said, pork taretare is not likely to gain a following anytime soon.

Susan Goss's Profile Photo Susan Goss
Executive Chef/Owner
West Town Tavern
Chicago, IL

Well hooray! it is about time. We have been cooking pork to about 135-140 for years.Most restaurants have. I haven't had a guest return a pork dish for more cooking in a year or so. Still, some request "well done" occasionally. The idea that pork contains trichinosis is antiquated. There hasn't been a documented case since the 1920's I believe. it is time to enjoy pork the way it is meant to be enjoyed: medium rare to medium.

Jason McLeod's Profile Photo Jason McLeod
Executive Chef/Owner
Box Tree Restaurant, Inc
San Diego, CA

i think it is great Chefs have been cooking pork at a lower temperature for years. I am not sure Pork can get any popular than it has the last few years but this might just keep it going a few more years.

Jill Barron's Profile Photo Jill Barron
Executive Chef/Owner
MANA food bar
Chicago, IL

this is acceptable. pork is best pink.

David  Katz's Profile Photo David Katz
Executive Chef/Owner

Philadelphia, PA

I am fine with that, 145 is pretty much cooked all the way anyway. 160 is really cooked, but I don't think it was a bad regulation, because most of the pork that the general public is eating is supermarket, dangerous pork! If you are using real pork that was raised properly and ate a proper diet, slaughtered properly, etc, than 145 or less is fine. We cook the pork here to medium. A little pink in the middle and juicy. We use good pork though.

Paul Fehribach's Profile Photo Paul Fehribach
Executive Chef/Owner
Big Jones
Chicago, IL

It's about goddamn time, that is all I have to say.

Nathan Sears's Profile Photo Nathan Sears
Executive Chef/Owner
The Radler and D.A.S.
Chicago, IL

The USDA will never say anything lower than 140 on Amy meat. They claim rare beef is 140. Pork is best medium and that's how it should be tricconosis is pretty mich dead and dies at a low temperature anyway.